The Killing of Henry Nowak in the Disunited Kingdom

Just another day in the not so United Kingdom.

Full show streaming now on https://t.co/rhA0Zj4o4j pic.twitter.com/Hd8BXL2jDg

— Gareth Icke (@garethicke) June 3, 2026

Hello and welcome to Gareth Icke This Week.

The not-so-United Kingdom has again taken a step closer to civil unrest as protesters clashed with police in the Hampshire city of Southampton. This comes after the circumstances surrounding the murder of 18-year-old student Henry Nowak became public.

Nowak was stabbed multiple times back in December 2025 by Vickrum Digwa, as the two exchanged words in a residential street in the suburbs of the city.

Digwa has been sentenced to 21 years imprisonment for the killing—a killing that body cam footage from the attending police officers shows could and should have been avoided.

Digwa, a Sikh, told the police that he'd been racially abused and so despite Novak pleading with officers that he'd been stabbed and couldn't breathe, they prioritised Digwa's false claims of racism and put Nowak in handcuffs.

Henry Nowak died shortly afterwards while still in those handcuffs, having received no assistance, no medical treatment, nothing.

Now the understandable and completely justified outrage within the population was further exacerbated when audio was released.

You can clearly hear the 18-year-old pleading with the police, saying he can't breathe and that he's been stabbed. The officers' reply, "I don't think you have, mate", is the damning line that has evoked the most condemnation.

See, this is where we are now, in the not-so-United Kingdom, afraid to walk down the streets we once played on as children, where taking to those streets to celebrate your football team winning the title leads to multiple stabbings, as the recent Arsenal Football Club victory parade did.

Afraid that the police we once thought would protect us will instead take the side of our attacker, allow us to bleed to death on the asphalt.

Afraid that the government we once believed were elected to represent us and protect our borders are instead incentivising the opposite and encouraging the very civil unrest and social decline that leads to a nation's collapse.

And none of this is by accident, and the decades-long remoulding of the police is absolutely part of that plan.

See, there are Vickrum Digwa's in every demographic that walk among us. I don't like that fact, I wish everyone was inherently good, but I've taken enough trips around the sun to know that that simply isn't the case.

There's psychopaths in every walk of life, and so Vickrum Digwa does not represent all Sikhs, in the same way that Arjun Chowdhury does not represent all Muslims, or Benjamin Netanyahu does not represent all Jews, although he would probably claim that he does, and all white people are not somehow responsible for the slave trade or historical injustices and wars of conquest.

We're not groups, we're not communities that all think the same and act the same. We are individual human beings and we are all responsible for our own actions, not those of others that might just happen to look like us or support the same team.

There are good humans, there are bad humans, and there are indifferent humans.

Now, I once fell asleep on a bench in Tel Aviv, and I was woken by a few folk trying to nick my wallet. Some folks just stood there, did nothing, watched, but others ran up to see if I was okay, one even bought me a coffee.

Good, bad, indifferent. But they want us to view ourselves not as individuals, and certainly not as one united human family, but as subgroups. Groups to be played off against one another. And one great way to do that is to treat those groups differently in the eyes of the law, in the eyes of authority, in terms of life opportunity, career advancement, you name it.

Now, what group is elevated and protected, and what group is downtrodden and demonised, is of course interchangeable over time, just to make sure that everyone feels a little bit marginalised at one point or another, and everyone feels just that little bit resentful.

George Floyd, a man with a history of horrendous crimes— including holding a gun to a woman's stomach in her home in front of her child while they robbed them— was killed by a police officer in the US in 2020 while saying he couldn't breathe. 

Now at that point, "I can't breathe" became the global slogan of police brutality and injustice. Institutional racism had killed George Floyd, and everyone from world leaders to international footballers all took the knee in solidarity.

Now, will they do that for Henry Nowak? Will Keir Starmer pose on one knee for a photo op like he did in 2020? Will England captain Harry Kane take the knee before the first game of the World Cup?

Well, of course not, nor would I expect them to. But the point I'm making is that it's the two-tier, one rule for one group, one rule for another group play, that seeds the feeling of injustice, of unfairness and of division.

Now that's intentional. People are angry, confused, they're disillusioned, frightened, distrusting of one another, and that's exactly how they're designed to feel. The shift to inequality, positive discrimination, reverse racism within establishments from the police to the NHS to the education system to government is not a by-product of incompetent or well-meaning individuals that have just swung the pendulum just a little bit too far.

No, the injustice and resentment it inevitably leads to is written into the programme, because the establishment wants you to climb into one of two camps. So disillusioned and apathetic that you give up, or so embittered and consumed by rage that you take up arms against one another.

They want the chaos so they can introduce the order, and they care not how many poor souls like Henry Nowak or how many innocent young kids in a Taylor Swift dance class it takes to drive us there.

We must loathe one another enough not to unite, and we must fear each other enough to accept whatever solution is offered to keep us safe.

We must loathe and fear Muslims. They're all terrorists. They're all terrorists or terrorist sympathisers, aren't they? Well, all of them?

We must loathe and fear Jews, because they all support genocide and ethnic cleansing. Again, all of them?

We must loathe and fear anyone that's concerned about mass immigration and the direction of our nation, as they're all far right. All of them?

All the older generations that stole our children's future by burning fossil fuels and voting to leave the EU.

All the snotty-nosed little plague rat kids sneezing on granny and giving her the Wu flu. 

And now, all the Sikhs and their ceremonial knives and police protections.

Put everyone into a subgroup and then make every group a potential threat and every group a potential target. That way, we'll always be divided. Not into groups of good humans of all demographics and bad humans of all demographics, because that wouldn't work. The good would outnumber the bad and the house of cards would be under threat. And they don't want that.

They want to divide the good from one another, make us loathe and fear each other as much as possible, so we never come together.

Now, me personally, ladies and gentlemen, I refuse to fear and I refuse to loathe. We've done that for centuries. And just look around you. Look at where it's gotten us. I think it's time for a different approach.

Transcribed by EY@EL
© La Pensine Mutine. All rights reserved. Reproduction prohibited.

Share:

Read More

The Increase in Left-Right Polarisation in the Wake of the Charlie Kirk Shooting

What’s REALLY going on while ‘Right’ is pitched against ‘Left’? pic.twitter.com/z2rb5yGhdK

— David Icke (@davidicke) September 18, 2025

Hello!

I just want to say a few things about current events and current happenings because I see people getting caught in a pincer movement which is pitching left against right. It's gathered massive pace since the shooting of Charlie Kirk and I'm looking on agape at how people are falling for it. In some cases people who should know better.

Because once upon a time, in the wake of COVID and before, the alternative media kind of understood that we live in one party state. And as they used to say in America, when I was traveling there a lot, in the 1990s, “it doesn't matter who you vote for because the government still gets in.” And that seems to have been forgotten in this frenzy of pitching right against left. And I just want to offer the benefit of 35-36 years of investigating and researching this.

There is another level, which, if we don't understand, we will never get the picture. And that other level is what I call the global cult.

It's a global network of secret societies fiercely compartmentalised, so even most of the people in the secret societies don't know the real big picture. Only the inner core does. It's all compartmentalised right down the system. And this cult has an agenda to create a global dystopia, which involves the fusing of the human mind, brain, body with artificial intelligence. So artificial intelligence becomes the human mind. And therefore it becomes possible to create a hive mind in which people's thoughts and emotional responses are fed to them. And all these AI oligarchs, Musk, Andreessen and Teal and Sam Altman, Larry Ellison... they're pushing the world towards this.

And as I said before the Trump regime came in, he's being brought in to target that area, that mentality which became known as the MAGA – that was pushing back on this artificial intelligence dystopia; was pushing back on the destruction of freedom of speech and all these other impositions, digital ideas, etc. And this level (this cult level) works through both the left and the right – and the bloody center, come to that – to push this agenda forward.

And how it works is when the left are in power, they target freedom of speech. We've seen this with the whole woke mentality: if you don't use the right  pronouns, you get fired. And so many excuses were used and are still being used in areas where the left is in power to destroy freedom of speech and freedom of expression, freedom of opinion.

So then you bring in… because people – and this is the targeting of the the so-called right or the MAGA – they don't want that. But you still got to bring them in to the arena of supporting the destruction of freedom of speech.

And so what you do is you have people like Trump and these other people, Vance, and Musk, all of them, and they stand up: “Oh, we stand for freedom of speech! We've got to stop this wokery.” And the people that don't want the wokery and the destruction of freedom of speech, under that justification, vote for them. And they get in. And then, once they get in, they start being increasingly a mirror of that using different excuses.

So now we have a situation in which the right, in the form of Pam Bondi, the attorney general in the United States – a Trump clone – is using the very term 'hate speech' that they used and they opposed.

We're seeing people like Alex Jones (my god ,what's happened to this guy?) who is promoting this agenda using things like accusing the left in the wake of the Charlie Kirk shooting, describing them as domestic terrorists. Now this is the same Alex Jones and the MAGA that were condemning the left dubbing the right, when they were in power, as 'domestic terrorists'.

And so we now have this fusion, 'dialogogy and dialectic' they call it, where you have the synthesis of two apparently opposing ideologies that now start to agree on the same ground. So when the left's in power, they use excuses to destroy freedom of speech. Now when the right's in power, they use different excuses to destroy freedom of speech using the very same terms like 'hate speech' and 'domestic terrorists'. 

It's a psychological game. It's a psyop on both left and right. And if we don't see this other level that works through both, then we are going to go on fighting each other while this level advances its agenda unchallenged.

Why do you think that Elon Musk suddenly appears at a rally, demanding freedom of speech, tells people to fight – gotta fight? Why are we having the same outcome, no matter left, no matter right, because they are both polarities of THAT. They are both pawns of THAT.

And that level is what we must not only understand, but we must focus upon and ask why.

Now, one of the great servants, one of the great agencies, vehicles for THAT, is the government and intelligence, military networks operating out of Israel. Not Jewish people in general, that level that runs Israel. This is why it operates in the United States. 

More and more people including Charlie Kirk were starting to see that, the massive influence it has. 

It has massive influence in Britain through people like Starmer; massive influence in other countries around the world in a covert way. And it's doing the bidding of that level. 

And so, when you look at things like the Charlie Kirk shooting, (appalling by the way, there's very little that he said that I agreed with, but you certainly don't respond to it like that),  but there are those immediately... What you can see, when one of these horrible events happens, be it 9/11, be it whatever, you have a story that is given to you immediately. That's why on 9/11, within minutes of it happening, the name of Osama bin Laden was introduced. Because  that was where they wanted to push you.

And if you notice, whether it's the assassination of  President Kennedy, of Bobby Kennedy, of Martin Luther King, whether it's 9/11, whether it's the invasion of Irak on weapons of mass destruction as an excuse, what you find is that the initial story or given is never the true story that comes out later. And so when I'm looking at this Charlie Kirk situation from that level, I'm looking immediately:  “What is the story they want us to believe?”

And immediately, the story appears with the MAGA media pushing it that it's the left. And so what you have then is a reaction against the left by the right: Bang! Bang! Bang! Bang! Bang! Bang! End of free speech. “We support not having free speech anymore.” That level is pissing itself with laughter at the naivety that it has instigated.

And then there's others come along and say: “Oh no, it was Israel because he was pushing back against Israel and that would have been a nightmare for Israel if if he'd have brought the Christian Zionists along with it.” But when you look at that level, well, both can be true and other possibilities can be true because what they want you doing is focusing on what they tell you is the perpetrator.

I can't say, at this moment for sure, whether Tyler Robinson did it or didn't, or it's a patsy, or was under mind control... I can't say that. There's a lot more research that needs doing before we can come to conclusions like that. But what's happening is that it's being pushed.

You've got ludicrous FBI story... The FBI, by the way, that serves that level through the generations. I mean, think J. Edgar Hoover for a start. And it's been telling you stories about these massive events like 9/11 etc. And they invariably turn out not to be true. They've even been exposed again and again for using their agents and operatives to set up and a terrorist attack and then move in to stop it and claim credit for it when they set it up. This is the FBI that's telling you the story of Charlie Kirk's shooting.

One thing you know about the FBI and these other people – like the alcohol, tobacco and firearms organisations, the NSA, the CIA, all of them, MI5, MI6 – is whatever story they're telling you suits that level and ain't for you to tell you the truth.

So you can have people... and I'm not relating this to the Charlie Kirk shooting because I don't know yet, there is more research to do, but I'm using it as a a blueprint for  how it's done. You can have the front of the spear as the person that's focused upon, the person who does it if you like, but then you've got to start working back through all these different levels to find the people that actually orchestrated the firing of the spear, the arrow. And in that way, you can have someone of the left or someone of the right carrying something out, but if you go back through the smoke and mirrors and into the shadows, you'll find who actually orchestrated it and made it happen.

And all that is what the alternative media should be doing, but largely is not in its algorithmically-promoted central core that's taken over the alternative media since COVID. And it's about time they bloody started and stopped being hacks and propagandists for the system. Because Trump's as much as part of the system as Biden was and Obama was because they're puppets of THAT.

I'm sitting here after... what 35/36 years – 1990 I started out of seeing all this unfold and seeing the patterns of how it's done and I'm looking on with shaking bloody head at how easy it has been for THAT to play the string section of what claims to be the alternative media. Now, there are some good people, some intelligent people, who are seeing it, who are doing it the old way by understanding how the game works. But there is the central core that gets all the numbers and the algorithmic support is playing the game of THAT on a scale that's beggar's belief. It's got to stop and if it doesn't stop, then we need to call it out, which I'm doing.

So that's just a few thoughts on the situation we're in. What they want is a civil war not just in America, not just in the United Kingdom, but around the world, so that we're so busy fighting each other that we leave that level alone to go about its business of imposing dystopia.

And remember this, as I'm speaking here, Trump's in London meeting the bloody king and Starmer. Appropriate, really. And in America, they're using the excuses of the left to impose blocks and deletion of freedom of speech. In Britain, we have a government, that claims to be left, that is using – and has done since it came to power – to excuse their destruction of freedom of speech basically the right.

It's exactly what I'm saying: when the right's in power it targets the left to destroy freedom of speech. When the left's in power it targets the right to justify freedom of speech.

Come on people, let's wake the hell up while we still can because we're being played !

Well, many people are and it should end. And it should end NOW! Because if we don't see it, It's going to be played off against each other until dystopia rules completely.

Transcribed by EY@EL
© La Pensine Mutine. All rights reserved. Reproduction prohibited.

Share:

Read More

Another Step on the Short and Dangerous Ladder Towards Tyranny

"Sometimes you need to speak up for people you don’t necessarily like, even despise, in order to stop them becoming the key that allows the wolf to enter your house further down the road."

Full show is live now on https://t.co/18P99N4I3F pic.twitter.com/kkt1F1sgkG

— Gareth Icke (@garethicke) May 21, 2025

Hello and welcome to Gareth Icke Tonight. In the UK, this week, Lucy Connolly, the wife of a former Conservative Party councillor and the mother of young children, has lost her appeal against the two-and-a-half-year prison sentence she received... for a tweet! Lucy tweeted in the aftermath of the unspeakable horrors committed in Southport, where three young girls were murdered, and many others injured, by a demonic psychopath, at a kid's dance studio.

The fallout of the Southport attack led to riots on the streets of the UK, as mass unfiltered immigration, and the consecutive government's refusal to do anything about it, was blamed for the murderous actions of killer, Axel Rudakubana. Several arrests and absurdly long prison sentences were handed out in what felt like minutes. One of those sentenced has already taken his life in prison, by the way. 

But Lucy Connolly was perhaps the most high-profiled of those locked up by the state. Her crime was a social media post that read as follows:

Mass deportations NOW! Set fire to all the effing hotels with all the bastards inside, for all I care. And while you're at it, take the treacherous government and politicians with them. I feel physically sick knowing what these families will have to endure. If that makes me a racist, so be it.

Lucy Connolly

Now, Lucy states she knows what the families will now have to endure, having lost a child herself, fourteen years ago. She will certainly have more understanding of the grief than most people. 

Now, was it a clever tweet? No. 

Was it a nice compassionate and level-headed thing to post? No, of course not. It was unpleasant. It was ill-thought-out. But if you can sit there and say you've never said anything unpleasant and ill-thought-out, then I can sit here with absolute confidence and call you a liar. 

It was deleted within three hours and a public apology issued, but no one wants apologies. They're not worth anything anymore because no one ever accepts them. The woke left saw to that years ago. And the woke right just, you know, followed suit. 

But the main issue here isn't whether it's a nice thing to say or whether Lucy is indeed a nice person tweeting out of character. I don't know the lady. She could be a right nasty piece of work for all I know, but that sort of isn't the point. 

If we're throwing nasty people in prison, the only people left free to walk the corridors of the Houses of Parliament, the Royal Palaces and, let's have it right, the Royal Courts of Justice, would be the cleaners!

Two and a half years in prison. Two and a half years away from her family for a social media post. A child without a mother for two and a half years for a social media post. 

Now, you don't have to like Lucy or her opinions to find this yet another step on a very short and dangerous ladder towards tyranny.

If you can be imprisoned for tweeting something publicly, how long until you can be imprisoned for saying something privately or even imprisoned for thinking something that's deemed inappropriate?

The normalisation of prison for emotion-driven and later retracted words, and the precedent set by this kind of sentence ‒ and indeed imprisonment in general for what you write on social media, even if you delete and apologise for it ‒ has very dark implications for free speech and freedom of expression. Because it's Lucy Connolly now, but it might be you further down the line, because no one aligns with the state on everything. You simply don't. 

Now, maybe your side is winning currently, which is why a Labour councillor, that urged for the throats to be cut of those protesting in the wake of the Southport murders, and was caught on video doing it, still isn't in prison while Lucy is. But winning sides can change and they can change in a heartbeat. So be careful what you wish for.

Sometimes,you need to speak up for people you don't necessarily like, even despise, in order to stop them being the key that allows the wolf to enter your house further down the road. Now Lucy is far from the only person being sent to jail for words, in the United Kingdom, and the court's refusal to reduce her sentence has again led to many accusing the Starmer government of ruling over a two-tiered justice system. 

It's hard to argue with, when the judge who refused Lucy's appeal, Lord Justice Holroyde – another fellow in a fancy dress and a silly wig – does have form for reducing sentences. Now he deemed Lucy's appeal to have no arguable basis. However, he didn't seem to think that when he halved the sentence of a paedophile, in 2023. 

Lord Ahmed of Rotherham, a former Labour peer, was jailed for five years for trying to rape a young girl and sexually assaulting a boy under 11. Yet his sentence was halved by the same judge that thinks hurty words are worthy of an equal sentence to child abuse. 

Now the fact it's Lord Ahmed of Rotherham, a grooming gang epicenter, is not lost on me. So whether you like Lucy or not, you can understand why people are finding this just a little bit off. Because who's the bigger danger to the people of Britain? Who would you rather have as a next-door neighbour? Someone that says bad things? Or someone that does bad things? I know whom I'd rather not have knocking on my door to borrow a pint of milk. 

Many are of the opinion that Lucy's sentence is disproportionate so as to set an example to others, and there may well be some truth in that. But what if it's also about achieving the very opposite? What if it's about making people so angry and disillusioned with the state and the lack of justice that they take matters into their own hands in the future? 

I've said repeatedly that they're more than happy to have people sat at home, watching their televisions, frightened to say a word or lift a finger. And they are more than happy to have people on the streets throwing rocks at coppers because, on one hand, they've already nullified the threat, and on the other, they can use that violence as an excuse to come down even harder on dissidents of the state. 

We're in chaos season and it's time to be streetwise.

Transcribed by EY@EL
© La Pensine Mutine. All rights reserved. Reproduction prohibited.

Share:

Read More

Hopium vs Black Pills: A Fool's Game

In the Matrix movie, the red pill symbolises the awakening, the escape from the illusion. But often overlooked is the fact that this is generally achieved through another substance, an alternative programme, another filter on reality. A pill, whatever its colour, remains an ingested element which alters our perception. It may either be a remedy for opening our eyes, or a poison to entrap us in another illusion possibly even more insidious than the previous one.

Pills and the Addiction to External Truths

The pill analogy used on social media follows a very simplistic binary pattern:

• The blue pill represents those who are ‘asleep’ and take in the illusion of the system without questioning it. It is the equivalent of narcoleptics, sedatives and other sleeping tablets in the pharmaceutical industry.
• The red pill is regarded as the symbol of awakening, but in reality it often turns into dogma, a belief in which people think they ‘get it’ and try to ‘convert’ others. It is akin to amphetamines, boosters and other performance-enhancing drugs.
• Newest addition to the arsenal of divisive measures and latest iteration of this dynamic is the black pill of the disillusioned who rejects everything, including those who call themselves ‘awake’. That would be the poison.

In any case, there is a constant feature: we keep swallowing something that comes from the outside, unconcerned whether we should ingest anything at all.

Case Study: The Manipulation Behind the Black Pill

Listening to this video (I'm afraid I have been unable to find the original version of this video in English since the person who dubbed it in French failed to provide any credits) which purports to expose black pills, you might think it aims at clarifying the situation. But in fact, it just reverses the very process it decries. It does so in a number of ways.

One of the first catches of her discourse is its incoherent logic.

On the one hand, she says black pills “don't believe in anything”. On the other, she claims they “believe that everything is a conspiracy”. How can you believe in nothing and yet have an absolute belief in something?

This contradiction is used to immediately discredit a position that challenges the prevailing narratives.

The video blames black pills for being emotional and easily manipulated, while claiming that they undermine the morale of truth seekers. But if truth seekers may be undermined by such ideas, it would suggest that they must be emotional and reactive too.

In fact, both emotion and polarisation prevail everywhere, and her argument uses this issue to project it onto a specific group.

“They don't have the ability to distinguish good from evil”. 

They don't polarise and that's a problem for the matrix which relies on polarisation. Good versus evil. Truth versus lies.

Last but not least, the “lack of critical thinking” and “intellectual laziness” argument is a conventional technique for invalidating someone and ignoring their arguments.

Not believing in dogma but observing and analysing instead is the hallmark of any individual in search of genuine intelligence. Here, however, deep questioning is equated with laziness when in fact, quite the reverse is true.

This inversion of reality is a well-known propaganda technique: blaming others for what YOU do...

Through this attack on ‘black pills’, the video actually seeks to divide and invalidate any overall criticism of the system. It promotes a vision in which you have to take sides (red or blue, but not black) and denies the possibility that individuals may not subscribe to this binary structure at all.

Why such hostility towards all-out rejection?

Because those who reject everything have no taboo areas.

‘Red pills’ fancy themselves as truth seekers, yet their quest has well-defined boundaries. There are issues they don't want to discuss, lest it might undermine their own mental structure.

If you just look at those two things, the political ideology and the religious ideology, what they create is no-go areas where you will not research, you will not pursue,  because you know that if you do, there's a very good chance that your political/religious ideology will be under threat.

And we see this with the so called right in politics, which has completely hijacked the alternative media in terms of the algorithmic promotion and finance. And they won't demand answers in areas that would put their heroes, like Trump and Musk etc. ,under question. 

David Icke

'Black pills’ are perceived as dangerous because they leave no room for intellectual comfort.

In the U.S., they use the word ‘hopium’, which is a contraction of hope and opium, to describe the numbing illusion of hope. And once again, hope is an expectation relying on external factors, which does not fit in with the concept of sovereignty.

‘Red pills’ need to believe that they 'got it' and that they're 'winning'. They cling to narratives which offer controlled hope, while preserving their worldview.

Red pills are but another programme of the matrix: a mental anaesthetic providing the illusion of awareness, thereby reducing our scope of vision.

Why Can't Certain Truths Be Accepted?

Everyone has a threshold beyond which their psyche freezes, lest it creates unbearable cognitive dissonance.

‘Red pills’ want to expose lies, but can't go all the way through: they need to maintain a consistent narrative structure to ensure they don't fall apart psychologically. Some realities are too extreme for them to absorb without a great deal of detachment.

Anxious not to fall into helplessness, they need an ‘identifiable enemy’ and a ‘possible solution’.

‘Black pills’ reflect back to them the fact that they are not ready to get to the bottom of it.

The Awakening Delusion: How to Switch Programmes Without Ever Changing the System

However, if this realisation entraps them into a new narrative, a new enemy, a new mission, then it's all just a change of programme within the matrix.

Yet even ‘black pills’ may become a trap as those who identify with the concept often  succumb to cynicism and pervasive rejection. They may believe they can see beyond it, but in reality they are still caught in a reaction mechanism, which means they are still under the influence of what they're opposing.

The video clearly demonstrates that the ‘pills’ dynamic is no more than a play of opposites. While the ‘Blacks’ believe they have escaped the ‘Reds’ scam, they are actually caught into another delusion, that of total rejection. They're convinced they have a wider scope of vision, but in reality they're still trapped in a pattern of reaction,  which only reinforces the matrix.

• Blue pills blindly believe everything they are told.
• Red pills think they got it and are out to convince everyone else.
• Black pills reject everything and cut themselves off from any form of discernment.

At any rate, it's another way of being manipulated, because instead of trying to see for yourself, you adopt a binary stance (full belief vs. full rejection). The real awakening is not about choosing a new pill, but understanding why we still think we need to take one in the first place.

Withdrawal: How to Break That Pill Habit

If we really want to break free of the illusion, we have to realise that any ready-made truths, albeit alternative ones, are still mental constructs supported by our need for safety.

Breaking free means seeing without filters and dropping our must-categorise attitude.

Breaking free means we stop seeking external solutions and start thinking for ourselves, dismissing any proxy beliefs.

Beyond the red pill urge to convince and the black pill need to expose, there's another way: the path of the clear-eyed neutrality of the out-of-the-box observer.

Until we do stop playing this game, we'll be forever stuck in that pill habit.

The only true way out is not to be found with coloured pills but in refusing to swallow anything at all.

© La Pensine Mutine. All rights reserved. Reproduction prohibited.

Share:

Read More

David Icke Exposes the Psyop

In this matrix of delusion, operating mainly through manipulation, diversion, division and confusion, many people equate opinions and beliefs with truth, thereby confusing it with reality, which is immutable, whereas truth is a matter of polarisation, the other side of which is lies, making it purely subjective and, by definition, dependent on our perceptions. 

For 35 years now, David Icke has been warning us against these pitfalls, inviting us to shed our blinkers and biases. Most of his avant-garde ‘theories’, described as 'far-out', may have been proven to be true, still people keep calling him crazy, criticising him for not offering any solutions. To those, he replies:

Read the books, mate - nearly 30 of them to choose from and you'll see solutions. The bad news is that it means YOU doing something rather than someone else doing it for you. It makes me laugh - or cringe - that so many can't see that exposing the way the Trump-Musk Psyop is scamming you and leading you to the same AI control as Klaus Schwab is actually a 'solution'.

They should carry on following their saviours and when they finally see how shafted they have been - some can already - at least I won't have to share their embarrassment. You do realise that people revealing the truth were once called 'conspiracy theorists' (coined by the CIA)?

Now the former 'conspiracy theorists', morphed into Trump-Musk propagandists, label those that are still revealing the truth as being 'black pilled'. Oh, the bloody irony. The Trump-Musk propaganda is an endless flow on X minute by minute supported by algorithms that guarantee millions of views, but I push back as best I can amid blatant shadow banning and I am the problem? I would find a mirror and reassess if I were you.

In the above video, which is an abridged version of a recent one-and-a-half-hour interview conducted by Josh Sigurdson of World Alternative Media (which I also translated and dubbed into French), he talks about what he describes as ‘no-go areas’ for research being potentially dangerous to the survival of any political ideology or religious belief. 

“And so I'm coming at this, and I have been all along, without any of that baggage. What that means is you will go where the information and the evidence take you. You don't have no-go areas.”

He also talks about the conspiracy to control human perception (“And where does perception come from? From information.”); the hijacking of alternative media to replace the mainstream; the useful idiots appearing out of nowhere who are being promoted by algorithms; the return to left-right political polarisation; the MAGA psyop (which, by the way, means ‘magic’ in Latin, hence Musk's “I am dark gothic MAGA” at Trump's pre-electoral rally at New York's Madison Square Garden, back in 2024, to be taken literally as “I am a dark gothic magician”) to neutralise resistance to the transhumanist agenda advocated by Schwab and the World Economic Forum. Don't forget how crucial and essential consent is.

To Musk who, by the way, declared two weeks ago on Joe Rogan's show (an alternative media veteran who's now singing a different tune), “If I fully destroy the corruption, they will kill me”, he replies: 

But you won't because that's not the idea. You are simply changing the nature of the corruption to usher in the AI controlled global society. Yes, the 'they will kill me' 'anti-establishment man' who gets massive government contracts from government, the Pentagon and NASA including a Starlink spy satellite system for government and the military called Starshield.

“Reuters revealed in 2024 that this contract ... between the National Reconnaissance Office and SpaceX [is for] a spy satellite network consisting of hundreds of satellites functioning as a swarm. The satellites will have imaging capabilities, and the satellite network will enable the US government to have continuous surveillance of nearly anywhere around the globe.” That guy.

He also mentions the technocratic oligarchs who are all gathering around Trump. And, of course, China and its social credit system, which is in the process of being westernised after having been tested and perfected at length since the Mao revolution. And last but not least, his ban from the Schengen area countries being renewed for another two years, which both mainstream and alternative media make no mention of whatsoever. 

And, as always, the useful idiots, great sermonisers who've never read any of his books but still share preconceived proxy opinions, unashamedly accusing him of controlled opposition. Some even go so far as to say that ‘if he were really dangerous, they would kill him’. And so based on this assumption, if I were the agents of the Matrix, I certainly wouldn't try to eliminate David Icke for that very reason. 

As Rabelais would say, “I'm not afraid of wolves, but of sheep".

© La Pensine Mutine. All rights reserved. Reproduction prohibited.

Share:

Read More

It Equals FOUR!

Most people rarely say what they believe if it differs from group-think unless they are among those they know are ‘safe’. Otherwise every last word is watched and processed for its unintentional and ludicrously-interpreted connotation that you are racist, sexist, ageist or transphobic. Before long in an effort to salvage some self-respect from this spineless submission to tyranny, people persuade themselves that they are not submitting to tyranny at all. They are only doing what they believe is right. At this point your knowing submission to 2 + 2 = 5 becomes a belief in 2 + 2 = 5. Your short and curlies are now in the iron grip of Woke insanity which is only a projection of Cult insanity and Matrix insanity.

Another part of your mind is not yours. Cult control of the global web of governments, corporations, media and institutions of society mean they walk and talk as one unit in their imposition of ‘values’. These ‘values’ are nothing more than weapons of control employed by those so devoid of ‘values’ that they would not know one if it bit them on the arse.

‘Antiracism’ is the cry of racists; ‘anti-sexism’ is the cry of sexists; and ‘equity’ is the cry of those who despise equality of rights and opportunity. ‘Equity’ does not mean ‘equality’ as in equality of opportunity. It means law-imposed racial and sexual bias which is a patronising insult to minorities and women. It is an expression of what I have heard called ‘cosmetic diversity’. This is when you have diversity only of skin colour and sexuality while ensuring that all your appointments, whether black, brown, gay or straight, have the same opinion. It’s all a scam to push an agenda through cosmetic diversity while destroying real diversity – diversity of view and opinion.

Woke’s ‘critical race theory’ is pure racism which insists that we accept the following premise: White people = racists; black people = victims. One is racism while the other patronises and disempowers black people and tells them they must define their lives by what white people do, say, and think. This we are told to believe is the behaviour of ‘antiracists’ who ‘care about black people’.

Wetiko/Yaldabaoth is a state of consciousness inversion and so therefore is the simulation that imposes its will. Everything is upside down, back to front, turned over, flipped and reversed. We do not deal with this by submitting to it. We do that by refusing to play a part in its integration into normality. Anyone is going to tell me what to believe, what I can and cannot say, and what my perceptions of everything must be? A bunch of psychopaths and prats are going to impose this and I am going to let them?

Deleting fear of what others think of what we say, do, and believe is the first base of taking your mind back from the simulation and its architects and operatives. Without this first step there can be no other steps. At all levels of mind the answer comes down to self-respect. Do we have the self-respect to insist on reaching our own conclusions and sense of reality or have we so little respect for ourselves that we allow others to tell us what to think and whether we think at all? Once we concede self-respect by submitting to tyranny and madness, only submission remains.

Mahatma Gandhi said: ‘I cannot conceive of a greater loss than the loss of one’s self-respect.’ But, as he also said, and this is the point: ‘They cannot take away our self-respect if we do not give it to them.’ Here lies the key to freedom. Self-respect will never bow to tyranny. Every tyranny in all ‘history’ is the result of self-respect being conceded by the masses and every tyranny has been overthrown by those who refuse to give it away. Fascism is not imposed by fascists. It is imposed by the population conceding its self-respect to fascists who disrespect freedom and diversity of view. You can’t have self-respect if you meekly accept disrespect.

The few have always controlled the many for a simple ever-repeating reason. The many give their power to the few through acquiescence which is the result of deleted self-respect. At the top of national and global pyramids is the inner core of the Cult and you would get their number in a single room. They impose their will, their agenda, on the next level which acquiesces to that will and imposes the same on the level below them. So it continues all the way down the pyramid – imposition-acquiescence-imposition-acquiescence. A very few levels below the Cult inner-core you are already dealing with people who have no idea there even is a Cult or an agenda. The sequence continues on the basis of doing what your perceived ‘superiors’ tell you without question or resistance. Eventually you reach the mass of the people at the foot of the pyramid and if they acquiesce to the levels that impose upon them – government and law enforcement – a circuit of imposition-acquiescence is completed which allows the will of the Cult inner-core to prevail nationally and globally.

In this way, and only in this way, a handful at the top dictate the fine detail of billions of lives and the direction of human society. This is exactly what has happened so obviously in the ‘Covid’ years. If ever there was an example of removing the cause to delete the problem this is it and the antidote is self-respect. Unquestioning acquiescence is the cause and that is what has to stop to remove the problem.

Original text by DAVID ICKE from The Trap (isbn:9781838415327)

Share:

Read More

Why Is It So Hard to Wake People Up to the WEF?

Why is it so hard to wake people up to the Great Reset and the World Economic Forum?

It is because the “evil conspiracy” is hidden from public view. It is designed in such a way that it prevents the average person from ever truly understanding the nature of the scheme. Below is a summary of a spot-on conversation on Reddit.

1. The very idea of conspiracy suggests secrecy, whereas the Great Reset is a fully-exposed direct open scheme aiming to create a global revolution of thought. Every year, they invite our leaders and the CEO's of major corporations and they've been doing it for years. People cannot fathom why an evil scheme would be made public. A common argument is “Why would Schwab outline his plans in his book?”.

2. The World Economic Forum (WEF) cloaks itself in positive values such as preservation of the planet, reducing pollution, access to medicines for all, human progress… People are inoculated against the idea of malicious intent. To resist those values immediately places you in the minds of the masses in a position where you wish NOT to progress, wish NOT to save the planet, etc. Think about it: only a madman would resist such ideas, right?

It requires years of research to realise the difference between genuinely looking to achieve those goals with a noble intent and looking to achieve those goals for a different agenda. The issue is why would anyone look any further into it?

But this is what people like Huxley and H.G. Wells have stated: the refusal of people to believe what is right in front of them—that speaks to why the nature of their global scheme must be OPEN. It is because they need as many people to adopt their values in order to move the scheme forward. They couldn't achieve that if they did it in secret with limited numbers or if their official values were not seemingly positive.

Klaus Schwab specifically states himself that they have infiltrated political cabinets. On their website, you can see that all sectors of society—particularly science and academia–are involved in order to rearrange the way humans think about the world around them.

It is a revolution of thought on a surgical level where the very essence of how a human forms a thought is changed to suit their benefits.

To be frank, it’s a perfect plan. That isn’t to say it can’t be stopped, but it is brilliant.

Original text by MOMOTCHI translated from French by EY@EL
© La Pensine Mutine. All rights reserved. Reproduction prohibited.

Share:

Read More